This joint is brand new….I got a hell of a deal on this. It normally cost over half a grand..
or sculpture when I’m older. Music is cool and all but there’s a bunch of other stuff I wanna do too. And even within music, I hardly wanna be in the spotlight. I’d rather be writing or mixing the tracks down. I’m waaaay too shy to perform in front of people unless I’m just playing an instrument or something. I’m trying to get back into drawing soon. I’ve always been a doodler. You’d be hard pressed to find a piece of paper in any my notebooks that I hadn’t scribbled something on. I used to think I had like…a problem or something lol. Maybe I’ll paint? So yea I wanna diversify a little bit in terms of my hobbies. Maybe take up writing. Who knows…but I have time.
is more fitting for a sample-based workflow. So when people swear by it as a standalone production center I kind of take it with a grain of salt because you have to keep in mind the kind of music being produced. To use the Maschine’s software component for producing tracks that may implement more than just sound samples that are to be sliced, chopped, rearranged, etc. is kind of a roundabout way of doing things. At best, it could be used as a vst for sampling.
But the thing is people exalt the Maschine when being compared to the Spark, the argument is usually something along the lines of: “The spark is just a drum machine; and a hybrid at that. Maschine is a full production workstation AND a drum machine.” But the mashcine has no sound generation capability unlike the spark; it’s all sample-based. the spark implements drum synthesis and so you can make your own toms, kicks, snares, etc. But you also have the option to sample if that’s what you’re accustomed to. I don’t think either controller should be used outside the context of a DAW, though. To use either one as a standalone to produce a whole track is somewhat of a stretch to me if there are a good few bits in the production that are original material…